REVIEWER GUIDE

We sincerely appreciate your willingness to serve as a reviewer for Jurnal Riset dan Aplikasi Teknik Industri Udayana. Peer review is a critical part of maintaining the integrity and quality of academic publishing. This guide outlines the expectations and responsibilities of reviewers in our journal, or you could download in this link

1. Purpose of Peer Review

The peer review process ensures that published research is:

  • Scientifically sound and methodologically rigorous

  • Ethically conducted and appropriately cited

  • Relevant and original within the field of industrial engineering

Reviewers play a key role in evaluating the quality, accuracy, and contribution of submitted manuscripts.

2. Reviewer Responsibilities

As a reviewer, you are expected to:

  • Provide an objective, constructive, and timely review of the manuscript.

  • Maintain confidentiality of the manuscript content and review process.

  • Disclose any conflicts of interest, personal or professional, that may influence your review.

  • Avoid using information from the manuscript for personal gain or research purposes.

  • Recommend acceptance, revision, or rejection based on scientific merit, clarity, originality, and relevance to the journal scope.

3. Evaluation Criteria

Please consider the following aspects when reviewing:

Evaluation Criteria Description
Originality and Relevance Does the paper offer new insights or approaches within the field?
Technical and Methodological Rigor Are the methods appropriate and clearly described?
Clarity and Structure Is the manuscript logically organized and clearly written?
Data and Analysis Are the results reliable, valid, and well interpreted?
Literature and Citations Does the paper reference relevant, recent, and high-quality literature?
Conclusions and Contributions Are the conclusions supported by the data and aligned with the objectives?

4. Review Outcome Recommendations

Please select one of the following options when submitting your review:

  • Accept without revisions

  • Minor revisions required

  • Major revisions required

  • Reject

Provide clear, specific feedback to justify your recommendation. Constructive criticism is highly encouraged, even for manuscripts recommended for acceptance.