RIEVIEW GUIDELINES

RIEVIEW GUIDELINES

 

Jurnal Sakura applies a double-blind peer-review process, meaning that both the reviewer and author identities are concealed from each other throughout the review.

Reviewers are expected to evaluate manuscripts based on the following criteria:

  • Relevance: Does the manuscript fit the scope of Jurnal Sakura (Japanese literature, language, culture, or institutions)?
  • Originality: Does the paper provide a novel contribution or fresh perspective to the field?
  • Methodology: Is the research design, data collection, and analysis robust, clear, and appropriate?
  • Clarity and Structure: Is the argument presented logically? Is the language clear and academic?
  • Citations: Are the sources current, relevant, and properly cited?

Reviewers must provide constructive, polite, and specific feedback to help the authors improve their work. Reviewers must select one of the following recommendations:

1.     Accept Submission (without revisions)

2.     Revisions Required (minor revisions)

3.     Resubmit for Review (major revisions)

4.     Decline Submission (reject)

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

PANDUAN TELAAH

 

Jurnal Sakura menerapkan proses double-blind peer-review, yang berarti identitas reviewer dan penulis saling dirahasiakan selama proses penelaahan berlangsung.

Reviewer diharapkan mengevaluasi naskah berdasarkan kriteria berikut:

  • Relevansi: Apakah naskah sesuai dengan ruang lingkup Jurnal Sakura (sastra, bahasa, kebudayaan, atau pranata Jepang)?
  • Orisinalitas: Apakah tulisan ini memberikan kontribusi kebaruan atau perspektif segar di bidangnya?
  • Metodologi: Apakah desain penelitian, pengumpulan data, dan analisisnya kuat, jelas, dan tepat?
  • Kejelasan dan Struktur: Apakah argumen disajikan secara logis? Apakah bahasanya jelas dan akademis?
  • Sitasi: Apakah sumber yang digunakan mutakhir, relevan, dan dikutip dengan benar?

Reviewer harus memberikan umpan balik yang konstruktif, sopan, dan spesifik untuk membantu penulis meningkatkan kualitas karyanya. Reviewer harus memilih salah satu dari rekomendasi berikut:

  1. Terima Naskah (tanpa revisi)
  2. Diperlukan Revisi (revisi minor)
  3. Kirim Ulang untuk Review (revisi mayor)
  4. Tolak Naskah (reject)