REVIEWER GUIDELINES

REVIEWER GUIDELINES

Reviewer Qualifications
To maintain the academic integrity and rigor of E-Jurnal Manajemen, reviewers (peer reviewers) must meet the following qualifications:

• Possess advanced expertise in a field relevant to the journal's scope and demonstrate a commitment to staying up to date with the latest developments in their respective fields.
• Have a strong publication record in reputable scientific journals, as evidenced by an up-to-date Curriculum Vitae (CV) submitted to the editorial team.
• Be able to provide objective, constructive, and timely reviews.

Duties and Responsibilities of Reviewers
Reviewers are expected to evaluate manuscripts professionally, fairly, and in accordance with the principles of academic integrity. Their primary responsibilities include:

Relevance and Originality
Assess the suitability of the manuscript's topic with the focus and scope of E-Jurnal Manajemen. If the manuscript falls outside the journal's scope, reviewers should recommend rejection or submission to another journal

Academic Integrity
Identify potential ethical violations, such as data fabrication, plagiarism, or inappropriate citation practices.

Title, Abstract, and Keywords
Evaluate whether these elements accurately and concisely reflect the content of the manuscript. The abstract must provide a clear and comprehensive summary of the research objectives, methods, main findings, and conclusions.

Manuscript Content Evaluation

• Introduction and Research Phenomenon
  Assess whether the introduction presents a clear research phenomenon and provides sufficient support for the formulation of the research problem.
• Literature Review and State of the Art
  Evaluate the completeness and quality of the literature review and theoretical framework in supporting the originality of the research. The literature review must be relevant, up to date, and critically analyzed.
• Identification of Research Gaps
  Assess whether the manuscript clearly identifies gaps in the existing literature and provides a significant contribution toward addressing those gaps.
• Research Design and Sampling Techniques
  Evaluate the coherence of the research design, as well as the clarity and relevance of the sampling techniques employed.
• Data Analysis
  Assess whether the analytical techniques are appropriate for the research objectives and type of study, and whether they are properly applied with adequate justification.
• Presentation of Results
  Evaluate the clarity of the results, their alignment with the research questions or hypotheses, and the effective use of tables and figures.
• Discussion and Interpretation
  Assess whether the discussion critically interprets the findings, relates them to relevant theories or previous studies, and explains their significance.
• Conclusion and Recommendations
  Assess whether the conclusion clearly summarizes the main findings, addresses the research objectives, and provides relevant recommendations for theory, practice, or future research.
• Supporting Elements
  Evaluate the clarity and functionality of tables, figures, illustrations, and mathematical equations presented in the manuscript.
• References
  Assess the adequacy and relevance of the references used, and provide suggestions regarding any references that should be added or removed.

Reviewer Recommendations
Reviewers are required to provide detailed and constructive feedback to the editorial team, accompanied by one of the following three recommendations:

• a) Accepted without revisions
• b) Accepted with revisions
• c) Rejected

Review Form
Reviewers are required to complete the standard evaluation form provided by the journal as part of the review process.

Peer reviewers play an essential role in maintaining the academic quality and credibility of E-Jurnal Manajemen. We greatly appreciate the time, expertise, and commitment they contribute to the advancement of the scholarly community.