Pengaruh Bahasa Asing terhadap Bahasa Indonesia dan Bahasa Daerah: Peluang atau Ancaman?
Keywords:
national language, loanwords, EnglishAbstract
The Indonesian language has developed very fast in modernizing its vocabulary by taking in many influences from foreign languages including Arabic, Dutch, English, Sanskrit, Tamil and Chinese. Similar tendencies are apparent in local languages, taking vocabulary in limited numbers from limited sources. Balinese, for instance, has taken loan words in classical and traditional religious matters from Sanskrit through Old Javanese and has let itself be influenced almost exclusively by English for modern vocabulary. Meanwhile Indonesian, which originated from Malay, has developed progressively from an early history, such as Sriwijaya kingdom, to becoming a coastal linguafranca across the country and the declaration of the language as the national language. Nowadays the government and educated people do very little to control influence on the language. A careful academic examination in relation to microlinguistic and macrolinguistic systems, cultural identity and nationality should be considered seriously when new foreign words are taken as part of the Indonesian vocabulary. Otherwise, in the long run, the national language will lose its identity and spoken and written Indonesian will be massively shaped by English elements. This kind of tendency has been very widespread in recent years
Downloads
References
Acri, A. ‘The Sanscrit-Old Javanese Tutur Literature from Bali. The
Textual Basis of Siwaism in Ancient Indonesia.’ Diunduh, 8
Desember 2012.
Anom, I.G.K., dkk. 2008. Kamus Bali – Indonesia Beraksara Bali dan
Latin. Denpasar: Badan Pembina Bahasa, Aksara, dan Sastra
Bali, Propinsi Bali.
Crawford, C. J. 2009. Adaptation and Transmission Japanese
Loanword Phonology. Disertasi. Cornell University. Tersedia di:
http://ecommons.library.cornell.edu/bitstream/1813/13947/1/
Crawford,%20Clifford.pdf. Diakses 06 November 2012.
Crystal, D. 2000. Language Death. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
Grenoble, L.A and Linsay J. Whaley. 2006. Saving Languages: an
Introduction to Language Revitalization. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Presss.
Marjohan, A. 2012. Evaluasi Pemadanan Makna Frase Nominal dalam
Terjemahan Teks Ilmiah Buku Cultural Studies Karangan Chris
Barker. Disertasi. Universitas Udayana.
Pastika, I Wayan. 2011. ‘Kelemahan Ejaan BI yang Disempurnakan
secara Fonologis. Makalah disajikan dalam Kongres
Internasional Masyarakat Linguistik Indonesia (KIMLI) di
Bandung (9—12 Oktober 2011).
Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 16 Tahun 2010 tentang
Penggunaan Bahasa Indonesia dalam Pidato Resmi Presiden dan/
atau Wakil Presiden serta Pejabat Negera Lainnya. Diunduh 28
September 2012.
Phillipson, R. 1992. Linguistic Imperaialism. Oxford: Oxford University
Press.
Pöchhacker, F. 2001. ‘Quality Assessment in Conference and
Community Interpreting.’ Dalam Meta. Vol. XLVI: 410--425
Pusat Pembinaan dan Pengembangan Bahasa Departemen Pendidikan
dan Kebudayaan. 1987. Pedoman Umum Ejaan Bahasa Indonesia
yang Disempurnakan. Edisi II. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.
Pusat Pembinaan dan Pengembangan Bahasa Departemen Pendidikan
dan Kebudayaan. 1988. Pedoman Umum Pembentukan Istilah.
I Wayan Pastika
162 JURNAL KAJIAN BALI Volume 02, Nomor 02, Oktober 2012
Edisi II.
Samuel, J. 2008. Kasus Ajaib Bahasa Indonesia: Pemodernan Kosakata dan
Politik Peristilahan. Jakarta: Pusat Bahasa.
Sneddon, J. 2003. The Indonesian Language: Its History and Role in
Modern Society. Sidney: UNSW Press,
Teeuw, A. 1961. A Critical Survey of Studies on Malay and Bahasa
Indonesia. The Hague: KITLV
Undang-Undang Dasar Republik Indonesia 1945. Amandemen
Keempat. Diunduh 28 September 2012.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 24 tentang Bendera,
Bahasa, dalam Lambang Negara, serta Lagu Kebangsaan.
Diunduh 28 September 2012.













