Hibridisasi Seni Kerajinan Patung di Desa Kedisan, Bali

Authors

Keywords:

cultural tourism, Balinese handicraft, hybridization

Abstract

This article discusses Balinese handicraft especially statue handicraft produced by craftsmen at Kedisan Village, Tegal-lalang District, Gianyar Residence. The competitiveness of the product is very high in tourism market and has the process of hybridization. The specific target that will be achieved related to the identity maintenance of Balinese culture. Thus the main discussion of this article is the caused of hybridization on statue handicraft in Bali. In the era of globalization the fusion between local and global cultures has already happened and this is a phenomenon of postmodernism because there is relationship of cultural influences. This condition can be comprehended from hybridization phenomenon on statue handicraft in Bali. Theories of globalization and glocalization are applied to analyse the data in this article. Qualitative method is used to achieve the objective and target through the implementation of participated observation technique and in-depth interview. The whole data is analysed descriptively, holisticly, and interpretatively. The Balinese artists on statue have done the changes in the form of statue through hybridization against the statue as the effect of made to order because of internal and external factors.

References

Ardika, I Wayan. 2008. ‘Pariwisata dan Hibridisasi Kebudayaan Bali’

dalam Pusaka Budaya dan Nilai-nilai Religiusitas, ( I Ketut Setiawan

ed.) 1 – 9. Denpasar: Fakultas Sastra, Unud.

Ardika, I Wayan, dkk. 2012. Pengembangan Pariwisata Budaya Bernuansa

Ekonomi Kreatif yang Berkeadilan dan Berkelanjutan di Bali. Laporan

Artikel. Denpasar: Universitas Udayana.

Barker, C. 2005, ‘Cultural Studies Teori dan Praktik’ dalam For a Critique

of the Political Economy of the Sign (Jean Baudrillard ed.). Yogyakarta:

PT Benteng Pustaka.

Chang, T., S. Milne, D. Fallon, and G. Pohlmann. 1996. ‘Urban Heritage

Tourism: The Global-Local Nexus’. Annals of Tourism Research.

23:284--305.

Fairclough, N. 1995. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Policy Press.

Richards, 1996. Cultural Tourism in Europe. London: Cab International.

Ritzer, G. 1993. The MacDonaldization of Sosiety. Thousand Oaks: Pine

Forge Press.

Robertson R. 1995. ‘Globalization: Time-Space and Homogeneity-

Heterogeneity’, 25--44, dalam Global Modernities. Mike Featherstone,

Scott lash dan Robertson eds. London: Sage Pulisher.

Ritzer, G. dan Goodman, Douglas J. 2007. Teori Sosiologi Modern.

(Terjemahan). Jakarta: Kencana Predana Media Grup.

Ryan, C. 2005. ‘Who Manages Indigenous Tourism Product – Aspiration

and Legitimization’. Indigenous Tourism: The commodificatiom and

Management of Culture (Chris Ryan dan Michelle Aicken, ed.).

Oxford: Elsevier.

Sutjiati Beratha, Ni Luh, Ni Wayan Sukarini, dan I Made Rajeg. 2016.

‘Hibridisasi Kerajinan Bali di Era Global’. Laporan Penelitian.

Denpasar: Universitas Udayana.

Sutjiati Beratha, Ni Luh., Ni Wayan Sukarini dan I Made Rajeg. 2015.

‘Implikasi Made to order dalam Autentisitas Kerajinan Bali’. Laporan

Penelitian. Denpasar: Universitas Udayana.

Szalvai, E. 2008. Emerging Forms of Globalization Dialecties: I nterlocalization,

a New Praxis Power and Culture in Commercial Media and Development

Communication. Disertasi. UK: Browing Green State University.

Tunis, Roslyn and Nelson Graburn. 2000. ‘The Nelson Graburn and the

Aesthetics of Inuit Sculpture’. Curatorial Notes at the Phoebe A.

Hearst Museum of Anthropology, Berkeley, California October 2000

through September 2001.

Turner, B. S. 1992. Max Weber: From History to Modernity. London:

Routledge.

Yamashita, S. (ed). 2003. Bali and Beyond: Exploration in the Anthropology of

Tourism. USA: Berghahn Books.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-21

How to Cite

Hibridisasi Seni Kerajinan Patung di Desa Kedisan, Bali . (2026). Jurnal Kajian Bali (Journal of Bali Studies), 6(2), 177-194. https://ejournal1.unud.ac.id/index.php/kajianbali/article/view/5602