Bali is a battlefield Or the triumph of the imaginary over actuality
Keywords:
Balinese culture, social imaginaries, critical analysis, Bali as abattlefieldAbstract
The idea of Balinese culture as a unique, largely timeless, harmonious synthesis of religion, custom and art is remarkably resistant to historical and contemporary evidence to the contrary. Such a hegemonic vision, however imaginary, conveniently underwrites both local politics and tourism, and so national and global capitalism. Against this ideal of Bali-as-Paradise, a critical analysis suggests a quite different metaphor—Bali-as-a-battlefield—in many instances to be more appropriate and accurate. To understand why the Arcadian myth has proven so attractive to both Balinese and foreigners, we need to examine the work done by social imaginaries. Hypostatizing, essentializing, then mythologizing, a largely imaginary monolithic ‘Balinese culture’ delivers a docile population which not only accepts, but enthusiastically embraces, their increasing alienation and their subjection to the political and economic forces of capitalism.
References
Adorno, T. & Horkheimer, M. [1972] 1993. The culture industry:
enlightenment as mass deception. In The cultural studies reader.
ed. S. During, London: Routledge.
Althusser, L. 1984. Ideology and ideological state apparatuses. In
Essays on ideology. London: Verso.
Anderson, B.R.O’G. 1983. Imagined communities: reflections on the origin
and spread of nationalism. London: Verso.
Ardener, E. 1987. ‘Remote areas’: some theoretical considerations. In
Anthropology at home. ed. A. Jackson, London: Tavistock.
Artaud, A. 1978. Sur le théâtre Balinais. In OEvres complètes, Tome IV.
Paris: Gallimard.
Barthes, R. 1973. Myth today. In Mythologies. London: Paladin.
Benjamin, W. 1977. The work of art in an age of mechanical reproduction.
In Mass communication and society, eds. J. Curran et. al. London:
Edward Arnold.
Boon, J.A. 1977. The anthropological romance of Bali 1597-1972: dynamic
perspectives in marriage and caste, politics and religion. Cambridge:
Univ. Press.
Castoriadis, C. 1997. The imaginary institution of society., Cambridge,
MA: MIT Press.
Clifford, J. 1988b. On ethnographic authority. In The predicament of
culture: twentieth-century ethnography, literature, and art. London:
Harvard Univ. Press.
Colebrook, C. 2002. Understanding Deleuze. Crows Nest NSW: Allen &
Unwin.
Deleuze, G. 1992. Postscript on the societies of control. October 59: 3-7
Deleuze, G. 1994. Difference and repetition. New York: Columbia Univ.
Press.
Deleuze, G. & Guattari, F. 1988. A thousand plateaus: capitalism and
schizophrenia. London: Athlone.
Durkheim, É. 1933. The division of labor in society. New York:
Macmillan.
Ellis, J. 1992. Visible fictions. Revised edn. London: Routledge & Kegan
Paul.
Fabian, J. 1991. Culture, time and the object of anthropology. In Time
and the work of anthropology. New York: Harwood.
Fox, R. 2011. Critical reflections on religion and media in contemporary Bali.
Leiden: Brill.
Geertz, C. 1968. Agricultural involution: the process of ecological change in
Indonesia. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
Geertz, H. 1994. Images of power: Balinese paintings made for Gregory
Bateson and Margaret Mead. Honolulu: Univ. of Hawai’i Press.
Goldenweiser, A. 1936. Loose ends of a theory on the individual pattern
and involution in primitive society. In Essays in anthropology
presented to A.L Kroeber. ed. R. Lowie, Berkeley: Univ. of
California Press.
Gramsci, A. 1971. Selections from the prison notebooks of Antonio Gramsci.
eds. Q. Hoare & G. Nowell Smith, London: Lawrence &
Wishart.
Grossberg, L. ed. 1996. On postmodernism and articulation: an interview
with Stuart Hall. In Stuart Hall: critical dialogues in cultural studies.
eds. D. Morley & K-H. Chen, London: Routledge.
Habermas, J. 1989. The structural transformation of the public sphere: an
inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. Cambridge MA: MIT
Press.
Hall, S. 1994. Notes on deconstructing ‘the popular’. In Cultural theory
and popular culture. ed. J. Storey, London: Harvester.
Hanna, W.A. 2004. Bali chronicles: fascinating people and events in
Balinese history. With an Introduction by A. Vickers, Singapore:
Periplus.
Hirst, P. 1979. Problems and advances in the theory of ideology. In On
law and ideology. London: MacMillan.
Hobart, M. 1982. Meaning or moaning? an ethnographic note on a littleunderstood
tribe. In Semantic anthropology. London: Academic
Press.
Hobart, M. 1999. As they like it: overinterpretation and hyporeality in
Bali. In The problem of context. ed. R. Dilley, Oxford: Berghahn.
Hobart, M. 2000. Introduction: after culture. In After culture. anthropology
as radical metaphysical critique. Yogyakarta: Duta Wacana Press;
accessible online at http://www.criticalia.org/Books.htm.
Hobart, M. 2007. Rethinking Balinese dance. In M. Cohen, A. Lopez y
Royo and L. Nozlopy, Indonesian performing arts in a transnational
context, special issue of Indonesia and the Malay World, 35.
Hobart, M. 2011. Bali is a brand: a critical approach. Jurnal Kajian Bali
1, 1: 1-26.
Hobart, M. 2015. Beyond the Whorfs of Dover: a study of Balinese
interpretive practices. Heidelberg ethnology, occasional papers 1:
1-20.
Hooykaas, C. 1964. Agama tirtha: five studies in Hindu-Balinese religion.
Amsterdam: Noord Hollandsche Uitgevers Maatschappij.
Hunter, T.M. 2007. The body of the king: reappraising Singhasari
period syncretism. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 38, 1: 27-53.
Laclau, E. 1990a. New reflections on the revolution of our time. In New
reflections on the revolution of our time. London: Verso.
Laclau, E.1990b. The impossibility of society. In New reflections on the
revolution of our time. London: Verso.
Raffles, T.S. 1817. The History of Java, Vol. 2. Appendix K.
Ritzer, G. 1993. The McDonaldization of society: an investigation into the
changing character of contemporary social life. Newbury Park, CA:
Pine Forge Press.
Robinson, G. 1995. The dark side of paradise: political violence in Bali.
London: Cornell Univ. Press.
Schulte-Nordholt, H. 2007. Bali: an open fortress 1995-2005. Singapore:
NUS Press.
Taylor, C. 2004. Modern social imaginaries. London: Duke Univ. Press.
Teeuw, A. et al. 1969. Śiwarātrikalpa of Mpu Tanakung. The Hague:
Nijhoff.
Theodoridou, N. 2012. Do the Balinese have theatre? Paper to the
International Bali Studies Conference on Bali in global Asia: between
modernization and heritage formation; available at: http://www.
criticalia.org/colleagues/select-bibliography---natal/
Vickers, A. 2005. Journeys of desire: a study of the Balinese text Malat.
Verhandelingen van het Koninklijk Instituut voor Taal-, Landen
Volkenkunde 217, Leiden: KITLV Press.
Vickers, A. 2012 [1989]. Bali: a paradise created. 2nd. Edition. North
Clarendon VT: Tuttle Publishing.
Vološinov, V.N. 1973. Marxism and the philosophy of language. Cambridge,
Mass.: Harvard Univ. Press.
Wilkinson, R.J. 1959. A Malay-English dictionary. 2 vols. London:
MacMillan.
Williams, R. 1983. Keywords: a vocabulary of culture and society. London:
Flamingo.
Worsley, P.J. 1972. Babad Bulèlèŋ: a Balinese dynastic genealogy. The
Hague: Nijhoff.
