Penguatan Ideologi Patriarki melalui Ritual Aci Ketiga di Desa Tenganan Dauh Tukad, Karangasem, Bali
Keywords:
aci ketiga, sekaa teruna, ideology, cultural patriarchyAbstract
The villagers of Tenganan Dauh Tukad, Karangasem, Bali conducted aci ketiga or ceremony that occur in May every year. The ceremony mainly conducted by the traditional gentlemen youth organization called sekaa Teruna. During this ceremony the young ladies group or Sekaa daha are not involved. This article explores the ideology why the ceremony were only conducted by sekaa teruna without involving sekaa daha? What is the meaning of aci ketiga for sekaa teruna or youth organization Data are collected using observation, deep interview, and library srudies. Data were analyzed through interpretative qualitatively. Theories of power and kmowledge, ideology and semiotic were applied in this research. The result indicate that saya play dominant roles in aci ketiga ceremony. He has to plan, act, and manage and responsibility the success of the ceremony. Aci ketiga ceremony can be seen as a media to preserve and practice as well as strenghterning the patriarchy ideology at the village of Tenganan Dauh Tukad.
References
Althuser, Louis. 2008. Tentang Ideologi: Marxisme Strukturalis,
Psikoanalisis, Cultural Studies. Yogyakarta:Jalasutra.
Barker, Chris. 2008. Kamus Kajian Budaya. Yogyakarta: PT Kanisius.
Bogdan, Robert dan Steven J. Taylor. 1984. Introduction to Qualitative
Research Methods. The Search for Meaning. New York: John Wuley
& Sons
Covarrubias, Miguel. 1956. Island of Bali. New York: Alfred. A. Knoff.
Fay, Brian.2002. Filsafat Ilmu Sosial Kontemporer. Yogyakarta: Penerbit
Jendela.
Foucault, Michel. 1977. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison.
New York: Random House.
Foucault, Michel. 2002. Power/Knowledge. Wacana Kuasa/Pengetahuan.
Jogyakarta: Bentang Budaya.
Goris, R. 2012. Sifat Religius Masyarakat Pedesaan di Bali. Denpasar:
Udayana Press.
Hoed, Benny, H. 2008. Semiotik dan Dinamika Sosial Budaya. Depok:
Fakultas Ilmu Budaya, Universitas Indonesia.
Khan, Adeel. 2011. Review of Roy Rapport. Religion and Ritual in the
making of Humanity. Journal Religions, Issue 2.
Korn, V,E. 1960. “The Village Republic of Tẽnganan Pẽgẽringsingan”.
Dalam Wertheim, W.F. (ed). Bali Studies in Life, Thought, and
Ritual. pp. 301-368. The Hague and Bandung: W. Van Hoeve
Ltd.
Kraus, Gregor. 2001. Bali in 1912. Singapore: Kum-Vivar Orinting Sdn
Bhd.
Miles, M.B. dan A.M. Huberman. 1992. Analisis Data Kualitatif. Buku
Sumber tentang Metode-Metode Baru. Penerjemah. Tjetjep Rohindi.
Jakarta: Penerbit Universitas Indonesia.
Mosse, Julia Cleves. 1996. Gender & Pembangunan. Yogyakarta: Rifka
Annisa Women’s Crisis Centre dan Pustaka Pelajar.
Parimartha, I Gde. 2006. Monografi Ringkas . Karya Melaspas Nubung
Daging lan Ngenteg Linggih Desa Adat Tenganan Dauh Tukad.
Tenganan Dauh Tukad, Manggis-Karangasem.
Piliang, Yasraf Amir. 2012. Semiotika dan Hipersemiotika. Kode, Gaya &
Matinya Makna. Bandung: Matahari.
Rappaport, Roy, A. 1974. The Obvious Aspect of Ritual. Ecology,
Meaning, and Religion. Cambridge Anthropology 2 (r): 3-69.
(Diunduh 15 ?9/2017)
Sendratari, Luh Putu. 2016. Membongkar Jaring Kuasa, Kekerasan, dan
Resistensi di Balik Perkawinan Ngamaduang (Poligami). Denpasar:
Pustaka Larasan.
Takwin, Bagus. 2003. Akar-akar Ideologi. Yogyakarta: Jalasutra.
Thompson, John B. 2007. Analisis Ideologi, Kritik Wacana Ideologi-Ideologi
Dunia Penerjemah. Haqqul Yaqin. Yogyakarta: IRCiSoD.
Werdhi Srikandi W.S. I Gusti Ayu Diah. (ed). 2016. Desa Tenganan.
Eksistensi Peradaban Bali Mula di Timur Pulau Seribu Pura.
Denpasar: Universitas Mahendradatta Bali.













