A Comparative Study of Language Maintenance among the Balinese and Dayak Ngaju through Identity and Core Cultural Practices
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24843/JKB.2025.v15.i03.p15Keywords:
comparative study on language maintenance, local languages, Balinese, Dayak Ngaju, identity, core cultureAbstract
This article presents a comparative study of language maintenance among the Balinese in Bali and the Dayak Ngaju in Central Kalimantan, viewed through the lenses of identity and core cultural values. Both groups share similarities in their sociocultural Hindu traditions and social structures: the Balinese are organized through the banjar (community system), while the Dayak Ngaju communities are traditionally based along river streams. The findings show that Balinese language maintenance is stronger than that of Dayak Ngaju. Balinese is widely used across traditional and modern cultural domains, while Dayak Ngaju is mainly used in traditional contexts. Moreover, Balinese is reinforced by its own script and a distinct diglossia structure, features absent in Dayak Ngaju. This study suggests that effective local language maintenance should consider the vitality of core cultural practices within each domain.
References
Abas, H. (1983). Fungsionalisasi Bahasa Melayu sebagai Norma Supranasional dan Bahasa Komunikasi Luas: Suatu Perspektif Sosiolinguistik untuk Tahun 2000-an. Ujung Pandang: Fakultas Sastra Universitas Hasanuddin.
Agulero. (2017). Batang Garing: Study tentang Sejarah dan Makna Simbol Batang Garing dalam Masyarakat Dayak Ngaju di Kalimantan Tengah. Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana. http://repository.uksw.edu/handle/123456789/13321
Atkinson, S., & Haj, M. A. El. (1996). Domain Analysis for Qualitative Public Health Data. Health Policy and Planning, 11(4), 438–442. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/11.4.438
Badan Pengembangan Bahasa dan Perbukuan. (2019). Bahasa dan Peta Bahasa di Indonesia. Kemendikbud.Go.Id. https://petabahasa.kemdikbud.go.id/index.php
Beratha, N. L. S., Sukarini, N. W., & Rajeg, I. M. (2017). Balinese Language Ecology: Study about Language Diversity in Tourism area at Ubud Village. Jurnal Kajian Bali (Journal of Bali Studies), 7(2), 121. https://doi.org/10.24843/jkb.2017.v07.i02.p07
BPS. (2003). Bali dalam Angka “Bali in Figures.” Bali: Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi Bali.
BPS Bali. (2021). Hasil Sensus Penduduk 2020 Provinsi Bali. BSP Provinsi Bali.
BPS Kalimantan Tengah. (2021). Hasil Sensus Penduduk 2020 Provinsi Kalimantan Tengah. BPS Provinsi Kalimatan Tengah
Chambers, J. K. (2003). Sociolinguistics Theory (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
Collins, J. T., & Alloy, S. (2013). Language use and language chance in Manjau, Kalimantan Barat; Exploring the Tola’ Dayak language and society. Bijdragen Tot de Taal-, Land- En Volkenkunde / Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences of Southeast Asia, 160(2–3), 226–282. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134379-90003727
Croucher, S. M., & Kramer, E. (2017). Cultural Fusion Theory: An Alternative to Acculturation. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 10(2), 97–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/17513057.2016.1229498
Darmojuwono, S. (2011). Peran Unsur Etno Pragmatis dalam Komunikasi Masyarakat Multikultural. Masyarakat Linguistik Indonesia. Online source: https://perpustakaanbalaibahasadiy.kemdikbud.go.id/index.php?p=show_detail&id=16464&keywords=
Davis, J. L. (2016). Language Affiliation and Ethnolinguistic Identity in Chickasaw Language Revitalization. Language and Communication, 47, 100–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2015.04.005
Duranti, A. (1997). Linguistic Anthropology. Cambridge University Press.
Febriani, R., Knippenberg, L., & Aarts, N. (2023). The Making of a National Icon: Narratives of Batik in Indonesia. Cogent Arts and Humanities, 10(1), 2254042. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2023.2254042
Foley, W.A. (1997). Anthropological Linguistics: An Introduction. Black Well.
Gandasari, A., Supiandi, M. I., Aristo, T. J. V., Oktaviani, U. D., Wahyudin, D., Hernawan, A. H., Selvi, A., Fiony, & Mawardi. (2024). Indigenous knowledge dataset of Dayak, Malay and Chinese communities in Sintang Regency, West Kalimantan, Indonesia. Data in Brief, 53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2024.110147
Hymes, D. (Ed.). (1974). Foundations in Sociolinguistics: An Ethnographic Approach. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315888835
Holmes, J. (2013). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. In Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling (4th ed., Vol. 53, Issue 9). Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Ino, L., Marhadi, A., Arman, Masri, F. A., Maliudin, Rasiah, Nirmalasari, Samsul, Dinar, S. S., Halfian, W. O., & Gaho, R. (2023). “Good Morning, Fokoamau”: An Analysis of the Addressing Terms in Pancana Language. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 13(10), 2544–2556. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1310.13
Janse, M. (2003). Language death and language maintenance: problems and prospects. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/294141422_Language_death_and_language_maintenance_problems_and_prospects#fullTextFileContent
Kadyanan, I. G. A. G. A., ER, N. A. S., Karyawati, A. A. I. N. E., Putra, I. G. N. A. W., Gunawan, I Made Suma, Budiantari, N. M. J., & Octavia, H. C. (2025). Balinese text-to-speech dataset as digital cultural heritage. Data in Brief, 60, 111528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2025.111528
Kemdikbud. (2023). Memahami Pentingnya Revitalisasi Bahasa Daerah dalam Konteks Keberagaman Budaya Indonesia. https://itjen.kemdikbud.go.id/web/memahami-pentingnya-revitalisasi-bahasa-daerah-dalam-konteks-keanekaragaman-budaya-indonesia/
Kleden, I. (2016). Konteks Nasional dan Global Politik Identitas dan Kebudayaan, 27-28 May 2016. In Seminar Nasional Sastra dan Budaya (pp. 1–15). Denpasar: University of Udayana.
Koentjaraningrat. (1987). Anthropology in Indonesia. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 18(2), 217–234. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20070968
Koh, H. H. (2005). Internalization Through Socialization. Duke Law Journal, 54(4), 975–982. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/40040506
Lauder, A. (2008). The Status and Function of English in Indonesia: A Review of Key Factors. Makara Human Behavior Studies in Asia, 12(1), 9–20. https://doi.org/10.7454/mssh.v12i1.128
Luardini, M.A., Asi, Natalina., and Garner, Mark. (2019). Ecolinguistics of Ethnomedicinal Plants of the Dayak Ngaju Community. Language Sciences, vol. 74, page 77-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2019.04.003
Marhadi, A., Ino, L., Suraya, R. S., Janu, L., Said, T., & Gaho, R. (2024). Understanding local wisdom as specific knowledge in natural disaster mitigation: An empirical lessons in Tiworo, Indonesia. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 45(4), 1383–1392. https://doi.org/10.34044/j.kjss.2024.45.4.31
Masthuroh, S. A., & Prihantoro. (2020). The Harmonious Relationship between Human Beings and Nature in Traditional Song Lyric During Sintren Ritual. E3S Web of Conferences, 202. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202020207019
Moriarty, E. (2020). “Sign to me, not the children”: Ideologies of language contamination at a deaf tourist site in Bali. Language and Communication, 74, 195–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2020.06.002
Murhaini, S., & Achmadi. (2021). The farming management of Dayak People’s community based on local wisdom ecosystem in Kalimantan Indonesia. Heliyon, 7(12), e08578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08578
Pun, R. (2024). UNESCO: Setiap Dua Minggu, Satu Bahasa Daerah Punah di Dunia. https://jabarprov.go.id/berita/unesco-setiap-dua-minggu-satu-bahasa-daerah-punah-di-dunia-12944
Rahmawati, N. N. (2020). Eksistensi Budaya Bali di Tengah Kemajemukan Budaya di Kelurahan Tangkiling, Palangka Raya, Kalimantan Tengah. Jurnal Kajian Bali (Journal of Bali Studies), 10(2), 491–514. https://doi.org/10.24843/jkb.2020.v10.i02.p07
Safar, J., & de Vos, C. (2022). Pragmatic competence without a language model: Other-Initiated Repair in Balinese homesign. Journal of Pragmatics, 202, 105–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2022.10.017
Setinawati, Jeniva, I., Tanyid, M., & Merilyn. (2025). The framework of religious moderation: A socio-theological study on the role of religion and culture from Indonesia’s perspective. Social Sciences and Humanities Open, 11(September 2024), 101271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101271
Saputra, G. W. A., Mbete, A. M., & Muliana, I. N. (2022). Humor Discourse in Art Performances of Shadow Puppets Cenk Blonk. Austronesian: Journal of Language Science & Literature, 1(2), 56–73. https://doi.org/10.59011/austronesian.1.2.2022.56-73
Shulist, S. (2016). Language Revitalization and the Future of Ethnolinguistic Identity. Language and Communication, 47, 94–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2015.11.004
SIL. (2006). Bahasa-bahasa di Indonesia: Languages of Indonesia. Indonesia.: SIL International.
Spradley, J. P. (1980). Participant Observation. Holt, Rinehart and Winston
Stewart, L. 2018. Exploratory Research: Definition, How to Conduct and Examples. https://Atlasti.com/reserach-hub/exploratory-research
Suan, T. T. (2014). Bahasa Dayak Ngaju Sebagai Bahasa Pengantar di Kalimantan Tengah. Retrieved August 3, 2017, from https://jurnaltoddoppuli.wordpress.com/2014/08/25/tentang-t-t-suan/
Subali, I. B. B. P., & Maharani, I. D. A. D. S. (2023). Sociolinguistics: Indonesian – English Code Mixing Used by Sport Commentators in Indonesian Football League. Austronesian: Journal of Language Science & Literature, 2(2), 76–85. https://doi.org/10.59011/austronesian.2.2.2023.76-85
Sudirga, I. K., Hood, M. M., & Yulianti, N. K. D. (2022). Strengthening Ideological Values through Pasantian Singing: Problematizing the Nexus Between Local Cultural Practices and Globality in Bali. Journal of Bali Studies, 14(2), 370–386. https://doi.org/10.24843/JKB.2024.v14.i02.p03
Sumarsono. (2017). Pemertahanan Bahasa Melayu Loloan di Bali. Pusat Pembinaan dan Pengembangan Bahasa Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Tangkas, M. R. U., & Suari, A. A. P. (2022). Pemertahanan Bahasa Bali Dialek Nusa Penida sebagai Sumber Konten Kreatif: Kajian Sosiolinguistik Kanal YouTube Alit Werdi Suputra. Jurnal Kajian Bali (Journal of Bali Studies), 13(2), 370–386. https://doi.org/10.24843/JKB.2023.v13.i02.p08
Tektigul, Z., Bayadilova-Altybayeva, A., Sadykova, S., Iskindirova, S., Kushkimbayeva, A., & Zhumagul, D. (2023). Language is a Symbol System that Carries Culture. International Journal of Society, Culture and Language, 11(1), 203–214. https://doi.org/10.22034/IJSCL.2022.562756.2781
Tempo. (2019). Aplikasi Digital Bahasa Bali Terima Penghargaan dari UNESCO. Tempo.Co. https://www.tempo.co/info-tempo/aplikasi-digital-bahasa-bali-terima-penghargaan-dari-unesco-708151
Social Affair of the Republic of Indonesia. (2009). Data-Based of Traditional Remote Area Community Year of 2009. Social Empowerment Directorate of Traditional Remote Community.
Tjia, J. (2013). Isu Kebertahanan Dalam Usaha Pencagaran Bahasa. In International Seminar: Language. Jakarta.
Ukur, Fridolin. (1994). “Makna Religi dari Alam Sekitar Dalam Kebudayaan Dayak”. Kebudayaan Dayak. Aktualisasi dan Transformasi. Gramedia Widiasara Indonesia.
Uyanne, MC. & Oti, OJ. (2012). The Influence of Socio-cultural Domains on Communication. Journal of African Research Review. Vol. 6, No. 4. doi.org/10.4314/afrrev.v6i4.16.
Yoniartini, D. M., Mahsun, & Burhannudin, B. (2023). Pemertahanan Bahasa Bali di Kabupaten Lombok Barat. Journal of Bali Studies, 13(2), 370–386. https://doi.org/10.24843/JKB.2023.v13.i02.p07
Wardhaugh, R., & Fuller, J. M. (2015). An introduction to Sociolinguistics (7th ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.
