Eufemisme dalam Bahasa Sasak Dialek Ngeto Ngete: Kajian Makna dan Faktor Penyebab
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24843/JH.2025.v29.i03.p07Keywords:
meaning, values, understanding, characteristics of eufemismAbstract
The objectives of this study are divided into two, namely specific objectives and general objectives. The specific objective is to describe the factors causing euphemism. Data were collected using the listening method, the speaking method, and the elicitation method. The listening method is assisted by basic techniques, namely the tapping technique and advanced techniques, namely the listening technique involving speaking, the listening technique free involving speaking, the recording technique, and the note-taking technique. The speaking method is assisted by basic techniques, namely the fishing technique and advanced techniques, namely the speaking technique. Data analysis was carried out using the comparative synchronic descriptive method assisted by the substitution technique. The results of the data analysis are presented using the informal method and with inductive and deductive techniques. This study was conducted in the village of Dasan Boroq, East Lombok. The number of native speakers of the Ngeto Ngete dialect Sasak language in this village is 1,600. For the research sample, 16 informants were taken randomly horizontally or ordinally. There are four factors that cause euphemisms, namely (1) the trust factor, (2) the comfort factor, (3) the politeness factor, and (4) the honor factor.
References
Ahearn, Laura M. (2012). Living Language : An Introduction to Linguistic: Antropology. UK: Willey-Blackwell.
Chaer, A. (2013). Linguistik Umum. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta
Fakihuddin, L. (2013). Keunikan Sapaan dan Panggilan dalam Bahasa Sasak Dialek Nggeto-Nggete. Mabasan, 7(1), 10–16. https://doi.org/10.62107/mab.v7i1.168
Hadi, Sutrisno. (1973). Metodelogi Research. Yogyakarta: Yayasan Penerbitan Fakultas Psikologi.Universitas Gajah Mada.
Hasani, H. (2018). Eufemisme dalam Bahasa Sasak Ngeto-Ngete di Desa Dames Damai Kecamatan Suralaga. Skripsi, Universitas Hamzanwadi
Keraf, Gorys. (1984). Diksi dan Gaya Bahasa. Ende: Nusa Indah.
Kridalaksana, H. (1984). Pembentukan kata dalam bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Gramedia.
Marzuki. (1989). Metodelogi Research. Yogyakarta: Bagian Penerbitan Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Islam Indonesia.
Poerwadarminta, W.J.S. (1976). Kamus Umum Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: PN Balai Pustaka.
Prawangsa, Y., & Mursidin, Q. (2023). Analisis Relasi Makna Adjektiva Bahasa Sasak Dialek Ngeto-Ngete di Desa Tebaban. MEMACE: Jurnal Linguistik, Pendidikan Bahasa Indonesia, dan Asing, 1(1), 21–26.
Rahardi, K. (2009). Eufemisme dan Kesantunan Berbahasa dalam Masyarakat Indonesia. Jakarta: Penerbit Bahasa Nusantara.
Ramlan, M. (1979). Ilmu Bahasa Indonesia Morfologi. Yogyakarta: U.P. Karyono.
Septi. (2012). Aspek Pemahaman Diakses pada 10 Januari 2015 dari ppbesp. Weebly.com/penilaian-rpp-smama.html.
Slametmuljana. (1964). Semantik. Jakarta: Jambatan.
Sudaryanto. (1982). Metode Linguistik, Kedudukannya, Aneka Jenisnya, dan Faktor PenentuWujudnya. Yogyakarta: Fakultas Sastra dan Kebudayaan Universitas Gajah Mada.
Sutrisno, A. (2018). Etika dan Sopan Santun dalam Komunikasi Sehari-hari. Jakarta: Pustaka Bahasa.
Tarigan, Henry Guntur. 1985. Pengajaran Semantik. Bandung: Angkasa.
Tarno. (2011). Linguistik Kognitif: Bedah Dunia-Teks Artikel Ilmiah. Kupang: Lima Bintang.
Thoir, N. (1993). Eufemisme dalam Bahasa Sasak Dialek Ngeto Ngete: Laporan Penelitian. Denpasar: Universitas Udayana.
Zaidan, Abdul Rozak, dkk. (1991). Kamus Istilah Sastra. Jakarta: Pusat Pembinaan danPengembangan Bahasa Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.