Assessing Taxpayer Compliance Using Segmentation: A Case Study of KPP Pratama Jakarta Sawah Besar Dua

Authors

  • Muammar Khadafi Faculty Of Economics and Business, University of Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Dwi Martani Faculty Of Economics and Business, University of Indonesia, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24843/

Keywords:

Policy Evaluation, Monitoring, Segmentation, OECD Criteria

Abstract

To enhance the supervisory function over taxpayers and improve tax revenue and compliance, the Directorate General of Taxes (DGT) issued SE05/PJ/2022 on Taxpayer Compliance Supervision, refining the earlier SE07/PJ/2020. A key provision of this regulation introduces the segmentation of taxpayers at the Primary Tax Office level. This study evaluates the implementation of taxpayer supervision through the segmentation method. A qualitative research approach was employed, using a case study at KPP Pratama Jakarta Sawah Besar Dua. The evaluation framework was based on criteria established by the OECD (2021), including relevance, coherence, effectiveness, efficiency, impact, and sustainability. The findings indicate that the taxpayer supervision policy utilizing the segmentation method aligns with the needs of the tax office in optimizing its supervisory role. The policy is e-ISSN 2302-8556 Vol. 34 No. 8 Denpasar, 30 Agustus 2024 Hal. 2163-2176 DOI:  consistent with broader tax regulations and aligns with policies implemented by other agencies. Furthermore, it has been effectively and efficiently executed, contributing positively to increased tax revenue and compliance while demonstrating sustainability. Given these outcomes, the continuation and further enhancement of this policy are recommended. 

References

Afriyanto, A., & Suwardi, E. (2023). Evaluation of the Application of Taxpayer Segmentation Methods: Case Study of Temanggung Primary Tax Service Office. Jati: Indonesian Journal of Applied Accounting, 6(1), 27-44. Benitez, Juan Carlos, et al. (2023). Building Tax Capacity in Developing Countries.Staff Discussion Notes, 2023(006),32. https://doi.org/10.508 /9798400246098.006 Chianca, T. (2008). The OECD/DAC Criteria for International Development Evaluations: An Assessment and Ideas for Improvement. Journals of Multidisciplinary Evaluation, 5(9), ISSN 1556-8180. Christian, F. F., & Aribowo, I. (2021). Supervision of Tax Compliance of Strategic Taxpayers at KPP Pratama Sukoharjo. Indonesian Tax Review, 5(2), 102-107. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th editio). SAGE Publications, Inc. DDTC News. (2021). There is Supervision Segmentation, AR KPP Pratama Focuses on This Supervision. https://news.ddtc.co.id/ada-segmentasi-pengawasan-ar- kpp- pratama-focuses-on-this-tax-obligation-34007 Directorate General of Taxes. (2004). Decree of the Directorate General of Taxes Number KEP- 178/PJ/2008 on the Details of Blue Print of the Directorate General of Taxes Policy from 2001 to 2010. Directorate General of Taxes. (2020). Circular Letter of the Director General of Taxes Number SE- 07/PJ/2020 concerning Taxpayer Supervision and Audit Policy in the Context of Expanding the Tax Base. Directorate General of Taxes. (2022). SE-05/PJ/2022 on Compliance Monitoring. Directorate General of Taxes Circular Letter. Elena, M. (2024). Sri Mulyani: Indonesia's Tax Ratio is Still Low Compared to Asean Countries and G20. Bisnis.Com. https://ekonomi.bisnis.com/read/20240305/259/1746816/sri-mulyani-taxratio- indonesia-still-low-compared-to-asean-and-g20-countries Ellet, W. (2018). The Case Study Handbook: A Student's Guide. (Harvard Business Review Press. (ed.)). Feny Rita Fiantika et all. (2022). Qualitative Research Methodology. In Rake Sarasin (March Issue). Global Executive Technology. Howlett, Michael, and I. M. (2017). Handbook of Policy Formulation. Edward Elgar Publishing. Khairani & Utomo. (2021). Evaluation of the Implementation of Area-Based Supervision in KPP Pratama Batu. Educoretax, 1(2), 82-103. Mader, C., Scott, G. and Abdul Razak, D. (2013). Effective Change Management, 2175 KHADAFI, M. & MARTANI, D. ASSESSING TAXPAYER COMPLIANCE… Governance and Policy for Sustainability Transformation in Higher Education. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 4(3), 264-284. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-09-2013-0037 Monalika, H. P., & Haninun. (2020). The effect of tax administration reform on taxpayer compliance: Case study in KPP Pratama Kedaton Bandar Lampung (The effect of taxation administration reform to tax mandatory compliance: Case study in tax office Kedaton Bandar Lampung). Journal of Financial and Management Accounting, 1(2), 135-154. OECD. (2021). Applying Evaluation Criteria Thoughtfully. In Applying Evaluation Criteria Thoughtfully. Peter Knoepfel, et al. (2011). Ten: Evaluating Policy Effects. Bristol University Press Digital, 221-250. https://doi.org/10.51952/9781847422309.ch010 Saraswati, I. A. P. I. (2023). The Effect of Taxpayer Awareness, Modern Tax Administration System, and Tax Sanctions on MSME Taxpayer Compliance at KPP Pratama East Denpasar. 71. Savin-Baden, M., & Howell Major, C. (2023). Qualitative Research. Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003377986 Tata Katarina Ram, R. (2023). Achieving Policy Coherence: A Central Role for Achieving Policy Coherence: A Central Role for Central Governments. M- RCBG Associate Working Paper Series, 230(May). Van Geet, M. T., Verweij, S., Busscher, T., & Arts, J. (2021). The importance of policy design fit for effectiveness: a qualitative comparative analysis of policy integration in regional transport planning. In Policy Sciences (Vol. 54, Issue 3). Springer

Downloads

Published

03-08-2026

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Assessing Taxpayer Compliance Using Segmentation: A Case Study of KPP Pratama Jakarta Sawah Besar Dua. (2026). E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 34(8). https://doi.org/10.24843/