The Influence of Financial and Non-Financial Characteristics on the Quality of Sustainability Disclosure of Manufacturing Companies in Indonesia

Authors

  • Luh Gede Krisna Dewi Faculty of Economics and Business Universitas Udayana, Indonesia
  • Dodik Ariyanto Faculty of Economics and Business Universitas Udayana, Indonesia
  • Anisa Virdawati Amara Faculty of Economics and Business Universitas Udayana, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24843/EJA.2024.v34.i01.p01

Keywords:

Profitability, Leverage, Gender, Age, Sustainability Disclosure

Abstract

Company transparency related to commitment to achieving SDGs as well as environmental and social impacts is conveyed through sustainable transmission (sustainability disclosure). This research aims to empirically analyze the influence of financial characteristics (profitability and leverage) and non-financial characteristics (gender, age, educational background, tenure of the President Director and citizenship) on the quality of disclosure of manufacturing companies in Indonesia. The research uses panel data regression analysis techniques with the Eviews 12 analysis tool and uses a sample of manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the 2015-2019 period. The results of this research can explain the miracle phenomenon of the stakeholder approach and upper echelon theory. The research results found that the level of leverage has a positive effect on the quality of manufacturing companies' sustainability disclosures. Meanwhile, the individual characteristics of the President Director have no effect on the quality of manufacturing companies' sustainability disclosures. The research findings provide an insight into the level of well-being from the characteristics of the organization and individual decision makers.

References

Ahmad, N. B. J., Rashid, A., & Gow, J. (2018). Corporate Board Gender Diversity And Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting In Malaysia. Gender, Technology And Development, 87–108. https://Doi.Org/10.1080/09718524.2018.1496671 22(2),

Ararat, M., Aksu, M. H., & Tansel Cetin, A. (2010). The Impact Of Board Diversity On Boards’ Monitoring Intensity And Firm Performance: Evidence From The Istanbul Stock Exchange. https://Doi.Org/10.2139/Ssrn.1572283 SSRN Electronic Journal.

Ardiana, P. A. (2022). Stakeholder Engagement In Sustainability Reporting In Indonesia [Durham University]. Available At Durham E-Theses Online: Http: //Etheses.Dur.Ac.Uk/14301/

Ben Barka, H., & Dardour, A. (2015). Investigating The Relationship Between Director’s Profile, Board Interlocks And Corporate Social Responsibility. Management Decision, 53(3), 553–570. Https://Doi.Org/10.1108/MD-12 2013-0655

Bristy, H. J., How, J., & Verhoeven, P. (2021). Gender Diversity: The Corporate Social Responsibility And Financial Performance Nexus. International Journal Of Managerial Finance, 17(5), 665–686. Https://Doi.Org/10.1108/IJMF-04 2020-0176

Dalvi-Esfahani, M., Ramayah, T., & Nilashi, M. (2017). Modelling Upper Echelons’ Behavioural Drivers Of Green IT/IS Adoption Using An Integrated Interpretive Structural Modelling – Analytic Network Process Approach. Telematics And Informatics, 34(2), 583–603. Https://Doi.Org/10.1016/J.Tele.2016.10.002

Freeman, R. E. E., & Mcvea, J. (1984). A Stakeholder Approach To Strategic Management. Management. SSRN Electronic Journal, January. Https://Doi.Org/10.2139/Ssrn.263511

Ghozali, I. (2020). Buku 25 Grand Theory 25 Teori Besar Ilmu Manajemen Akuntansi Dan Bisnis.

Hambrick, D. C. (2007). Upper Echelons Theory: An Update. Academy Of Management Review, Https://Doi.Org/10.5465/Amr.2007.24345254 32(2), 334–343.

Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper Echelons: The Organization As A Reflection Of Its Top Managers. Academy Of Management Review, 9(2), 193 206. Https://Doi.Org/10.5465/Amr.1984.4277628

Huang, S. K. (2013). The Impact Of CEO Characteristics On Corporate Sustainable Development. Corporate Social Responsibility And Environmental Management, 20(4), 234–244. Https://Doi.Org/10.1002/Csr.1295

Hummel, K., & Schlick, C. (2016). The Relationship Between Sustainability Performance And Sustainability Disclosure – Reconciling Voluntary Disclosure Theory And Legitimacy Theory. Journal Of Accounting And Public Policy, 35(5), 455–476. Https://Doi.Org/10.1016/J.Jaccpubpol.2016.06.001

Hyun, E., Yang, D., Jung, H., & Hong, K. (2016). Women On Boards And Corporate Social Responsibility. Sustainability, 8(4), 300. Https://Doi.Org/10.3390/Su8040300

Kristiawan, N. B. (2020). CEO Characteristics, Ownership Concentration And Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure. Jurnal Bisnis Dan Akuntansi, 147 166. Https://Doi.Org/10.34208/Jba.V22i2.701

Kwalomine, A. L. (2018). Pendidikan, Masa Jabatan Direktur Utama Dan Pengungkapan Corporate Sosial Responsibility (CSR). Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Terpadu, 11(1). Https://Doi.Org/10.35448/Jrat.V11i1.4224

Liao, L., Luo, L., & Tang, Q. (2015). Gender Diversity, Board Independence, Environmental Committee And Greenhouse Gas Disclosure. The British Accounting Review, Https://Doi.Org/10.1016/J.Bar.2014.01.002 47(4), 409–424.

Muttakin, M. B., Khan, A., & Subramaniam, N. (2015). Firm Characteristics, Board Diversity And Corporate Social Responsibility. Pacific Accounting Review, 27(3), 353–372. Https://Doi.Org/10.1108/PAR-01-2013-0007

Oxelheim, L., & Randøy, T. (2001). The Impact Of Foreign Board Membership On Firm Value.

Rahmadinar, F. D., & Khuzaini, K. (2019). Pengaruh Profitabilitas, Leverage Dan Ukuran Perusahaan Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan. Jurnal Ilmu Dan Riset Manajemen , 8(2).

Rao, K., & Tilt, C. (2016). Board Composition And Corporate Social Responsibility: The Role Of Diversity, Gender, Strategy And Decision Making. Journal Of Business Ethics, 138(2), 327–347. Https://Doi.Org/10.1007/S10551-015-2613 5

Setiawan, D., Hapsari, R. T., & Wibawa, A. (2018). Dampak Karakteristik Dewan Direksi Terhadap Pengungkapan Corporate Social Responsibility Pada Perusahaan Pertambangan Di Indonesia. MIX: Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, 8(1).

Shamil, M. M., Shaikh, J. M., Ho, P. L., & Krishnan, A. (2014). The Influence Of Board Characteristics On Sustainability Reporting Empirical Evidence From Sri Lankan Firms. Asian Review Of Accounting, 22(2), 78–97. Https://Doi.Org/10.1108/ARA-09-2013-0060

Sugiyono. (2016). Metode Penelitian Adminstrasi. Bandung: Penerbit Alfabeta.

Triyani, A., & Setyahuni, S. W. (2020). Pengaruh Karakteristik Ceo Terhadap Pengungkapan Informasi Environmental, Social, And Governance (ESG). Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, Https://Doi.Org/10.30659/Ekobis.21.2.72-83 21(2), 72.

Yao, Z. (2010). Typology Of Nothing: Heidegger, Daoism And Buddhism [Abstract]. Comparative Philosophy: An International Journal Of Constructive Engagement Of Distinct Approaches Toward World Philosophy, 1(1). Https://Doi.Org/10.31979/2151-6014(2010).010107

Downloads

Published

31-01-2024

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

The Influence of Financial and Non-Financial Characteristics on the Quality of Sustainability Disclosure of Manufacturing Companies in Indonesia. (2024). E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 34(1). https://doi.org/10.24843/EJA.2024.v34.i01.p01