The Dilemma of Internal Control System (SPI) Compliance Requirements and Profitability Pressures

Authors

  • Imam Baihaqi Ahmad Faculty of Economics and Business, STIESIA Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Nur Fadjrih Asyik Faculty of Economics and Business, STIESIA Surabaya, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24843/EJA.2026.v36.i04.p09

Keywords:

SPI Compliance , Profitability Pressure , Management Perception

Abstract

This study aims to understand how management interprets the dilemma between Internal Control System (SPI) compliance and profitability pressure and its implications for decision-making. The study was conducted at PT KAI, a plywood manufacturing company in East Java, using a qualitative phenomenological approach. Data were collected through in-depth interviews with the Director and FAT Manager, supported by observation and documentation. The analysis used thematic analysis to identify and interpret meaning. The findings show that SPI is interpreted ambivalently, as a risk control mechanism and as an operational burden. Profitability pressure is interpreted as a key consideration, leading to selective SPI implementation based on risk and operational needs. This study contributes by showing that SPI implementation is shaped by managerial meaning-making in navigating the tension between compliance and profitability.

References

ACFE. 2022. Report to the Nations: 2022 Global Study on Occupational Fraud and Abuse. Association of Certified Fraud Examiners.

Ajzen, I. 1991. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.

Al‑Haddad, L., & Al‑Shami, S. 2020. Internal control systems and organizational performance: Empirical evidence. Journal of Accounting Research, 58(2), 234–250.

Angrosino, M. 2021. Observation as a Method. Routledge.

Anthony, R. N., & Govindarajan, V. 2020. Management Control Systems (16th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Education.

Ardini, L., & Nugroho, A. 2021. Pengaruh pengendalian internal terhadap kinerja keuangan perusahaan manufaktur. Jurnal Dinamika Akuntansi dan Bisnis, 8(1), 51–62. (SINTA 2)

Arens, A. A., Elder, R. J., & Beasley, M. S. 2017. Auditing and Assurance Services (16th ed.). Boston: Pearson.

Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Republik Indonesia. 2022. Ikhtisar Hasil Pemeriksaan Semester I Tahun 2022. https://www.bpk.go.id

Barney, J. B. 2021. Gaining and Sustaining Competitive Advantage (6th ed.). New York: Pearson.

Bowen, G. A. 2009. Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

Brigham, E. F., & Houston, J. F. 2019. Fundamentals of Financial Management (15th ed.). Boston: Cengage Learning.

COSO. 2013. Internal Control–Integrated Framework. Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. 2018. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57–74.

Fadilah, S., & Santoso, B. 2021. Strategi manajemen menghadapi tekanan regulasi dan target laba. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis, 26(2), 110–122.

Gibson, J. L., Ivancevich, J. M., Donnelly, J. H., & Konopaske, R. 2012. Organizations: Behavior, Structure, Processes (14th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Gitman, L. J., & Zutter, C. J. 2018. Principles of Managerial Finance (15th ed.). New York: Pearson.

Harahap, S. S. 2021. Teori Akuntansi (Revisi). Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Henk, J. 2020. Managerial perception and internal control effectiveness: A qualitative study. Journal of Management Control, 31(3), 299–322.

Herawaty, N., & Hernando, A. 2020. Pengendalian internal dan pencegahan fraud. Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma, 11(2), 235–251.

Herawaty, N., & Hernando, F. 2020. Good corporate governance, pengendalian internal dan pencegahan kecurangan. Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma, 11(3), 462–475. (SINTA 2)

Humam, A., et al. 2020. Kepatuhan dan risiko fraud di sektor publik Indonesia. Jurnal Akuntabilitas, 13(2), 140–152.

Humam, M., Sari, R. N., & Siregar, S. V. 2020. Efektivitas pengendalian internal dan kepatuhan terhadap peraturan. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi dan Keuangan Indonesia, 5(1), 47–58.

Humam, S., Mutiarin, D., & Nugroho, H. 2020. Efektivitas pengendalian internal terhadap pencegahan kecurangan. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi dan Keuangan Indonesia, 5(2), 105–116.(SINTA 2)

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.

KPMG. 2022. Fraud Barometer 2022. https://home.kpmg/xx/en/home/insights/2022/11/fraud-barometer.html

Lewis, M. W. 2000. Exploring paradox: Toward a more comprehensive guide. Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 760–776.

Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. 1977. Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.

Moleong, L. J. 2019. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Mulyadi, D. 2016. Sistem Pengendalian Intern. Salemba Empat.

Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. 2017. Thematic analysis: Striving to meet trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1).

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2017. OECD guidelines for multinational enterprises (2017 ed.). Paris: OECD Publishing.

Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK). 2022. Laporan Tahunan OJK 2022. https://www.ojk.go.id/id/berita-dan-kegiatan/publikasi/Pages/Laporan-Tahunan-OJK-2022.aspx

Porter, M. E. 1985. Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. New York, NY: Free Press.

Prawitt, D. F., Smith, J. L., & Wood, D. A. 2019. Internal audit quality and earnings management. The Accounting Review, 84(4), 1255–1280.

Putri, F., & Nugroho, A. 2020. Dilema antara kepatuhan dan inovasi di perusahaan manufaktur. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Bisnis, 19(1), 12–24.

Putri, R. M., & Nugroho, A. 2020. Implementasi pengendalian internal adaptif dan dampaknya terhadap inovasi dan laba. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi dan Bisnis, 15(1), 34–45.

Putri, W. A., & Nugroho, A. 2020. Pengaruh kepatuhan internal terhadap inovasi dan kinerja perusahaan. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi dan Bisnis, 15(2), 89–98. (SINTA 2)

Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. 2022. Organizational Behavior (19th ed.). Pearson Education.

Sari, A., & Nugroho, A. 2021. Implementasi pengendalian internal dalam meningkatkan kinerja perusahaan. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 23(1), 15–27.

Sari, D., & Prastiwi, A. 2018. Pengaruh pengendalian internal terhadap pencegahan fraud dan profitabilitas. Jurnal Reviu Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 8(1), 47–57.

Sari, P. N., & Nugroho, A. 2021. Pengaruh kontrol internal terhadap kinerja keuangan. Jurnal Reviu Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 11(1), 22–31.

__________ & Prastiwi, A. 2018. Pengaruh pengendalian internal terhadap akurasi laporan keuangan dan fraud. Jurnal Reviu Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 8(1), 15–27.

Scheetz, A. M., Fogarty, T. J., & Snowball, D. 2022. Management perceptions of internal controls and whistleblowing. Journal of Business Ethics, 180(3), 725–741.

Scott, W. R. 2014. Institutions and Organizations: Ideas, Interests, and Identities (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Simons, R. 1995. Levers of Control: How Managers Use Innovative Control Systems to Drive Strategic Renewal. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

Smith, W. K. 2014. Dynamic decision making: A model of senior leaders managing strategic paradoxes. Academy of Management Journal, 57(6), 1592–1623.

____________ & Lewis, M. W. 2011. Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 381–403.

Sugiyono. 2017. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Supriyadi, N., & Handayani, R. 2018. Persepsi manajer terhadap efektivitas pengendalian internal dan implikasinya. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 6(3), 455–467.

Suryani, E., & Nugroho, A. 2023. Persepsi manajemen atas pengendalian internal dan dampaknya terhadap laba di sektor manufaktur. Jurnal Akuntansi Kontemporer, 9(1), 33–47.

Yin, R. K. 2018. Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Downloads

Published

30-04-2026

How to Cite

Baihaqi Ahmad, I., & Asyik, N. F. (2026). The Dilemma of Internal Control System (SPI) Compliance Requirements and Profitability Pressures. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 36(4). https://doi.org/10.24843/EJA.2026.v36.i04.p09

Issue

Section

Articles