Determinants of Fraud Tendency among Accounting Students: The Moderating Role of Ethical Value
Keywords:
Fraud Hexagon, Fraud Tendency, Ethical Values, Accounting StudentsAbstract
This study analyzes factors influencing fraud tendency among accounting students based on the fraud hexagon theory, including pressure, opportunity, rationalization, competence, arrogance, and collusion, and examines ethical value as a moderating variable. Fraud tendency is considered an early indicator of unethical behavior, making its identification during education essential. This study applies a quantitative survey approach using questionnaires distributed to final-year accounting students at STIE Cendekia Bojonegoro and the Islamic University of Darul Ulum Lamongan. Data were analyzed using Moderated Regression Analysis (MRA). The results show that pressure, rationalization, and arrogance positively affect fraud tendency, while competence has a negative effect. Opportunity and collusion are insignificant. Ethical value negatively moderates the relationship between arrogance and fraud tendency but does not moderate the other factors. These findings highlight the importance of strengthening ethical values in accounting education to prevent fraud tendency early.
References
Achmad, T., Ghozali, I., & Pamungkas, I. D. (2022). Hexagon Fraud: Detection of Fraudulent Financial Reporting in State-Owned Enterprises Indonesia. Economies, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/economies10010013
Affandi, A., Hakim, T. I. M. R., & Prasetyono, P. (2022). Dimensi fraud hexagon dan spiritualitas pada kecurangan akademik selama pembelajaran daring. InFestasi, 18(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.21107/infestasi.v18i1.14605
Ampuni, S., Kautsari, N., Maharani, M., Kuswardani, S., & Buwono, S. B. S. (2020). Academic dishonesty in Indonesian college students: An investigation from a moral psychology perspective. Journal of Academic Ethics, 18(4), 395–417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-019-09352-2
Aprilia, A. (2017). Analisis pengaruh fraud pentagon terhadap kecurangan laporan keuangan menggunakan Beneish model pada perusahaan yang menerapkan ASEAN Corporate Governance Scorecard. Jurnal ASET (Akuntansi Riset), 9(1), 101–132. https://doi.org/10.17509/jaset.v9i1.5259.
Association of Certified Fraud Examiners Indonesia. (2019). Survei Fraud Indonesia. ACFE Indonesia. https://acfe-indonesia.or.id/
Ballantine, J., Guo, X., & Larres, P. (n.d.). Can future managers and business executives be influenced to behave more ethically in the workplace? The impact of approaches to learning on business students’ cheating behavior.
Christiana, A., Kristiani, A., & Pangestu, S. (2021). Kecurangan pembelajaran daring pada awal pandemi: Dimensi fraud pentagon. Jurnal Pendidikan Akuntansi Indonesia, 19(1), 66–83. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpai.v19i1.40734
Dewi, I. G. A. R. P., & Pertama, I. G. A. W. (2020). Perilaku kecurangan akademik mahasiswa akuntansi: Dimensi fraud diamond. JIA (Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi), 5(2), 221–234. https://journal.civiliza.org/index.php/gej/article/view/179
Dewi, P. (2016). Perilaku kecurangan akademik pada mahasiswa S1, S2, dan S3 jurusan akuntansi FEB UB berdasarkan konsep Diamond Fraud. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Brawijaya, 4(2), 1–14. https://jimfeb.ub.ac.id/index.php/jimfeb/article/view/2873.
Fadersair, K., Kristen, U., & Wacana, K. (n.d.). Perilaku Kecurangan Akademik Mahasiswa Akuntansi : Dimensi Fraud Pentagon (Studi Kasus Pada Mahasiswa Prodi Akuntansi Ukrida). Jurnal Akuntansi Bisnis, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.30813/jab.v12i2.1766
Fernandhytia, F., & Muslichah, M. (2020). The Effect of Internal Control, Individual Morality and Ethical Value on Accounting Fraud Tendency. Media Ekonomi Dan Manajemen, 35(1), 112. https://doi.org/10.24856/mem.v35i1.1343
Fitri, A. F., Syukur, M., & Justisa, G. (2019). Do the fraud triangle components motivate fraud in Indonesia? Jurnal Ekonomi, Bisnis, dan Akuntansi Ventura, 22(1), 1–10.
Guerrero-Dib, J. G., Portales, L., & Heredia-Escorza, Y. (2020). Impact of academic integrity on workplace ethical behaviour. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-020-0051-3
Hariri, H., Pradana, A. W. S., & Rahman, F. (2018). Mendeteksi perilaku kecurangan akademik dengan perspektif fraud diamond theory. Jurnal Ketahanan Pangan, 2(1), 1–11. https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/269668-mendeteksi-perilaku-kecurangan-akademik-29d55220.pdf
Hidayat, R. W., & Sangka, K. B. (2025). Penggunaan ChatGPT sebagai variabel moderasi pada kecurangan akademik mahasiswa: Sebuah tinjauan Fraud Pentagon. Jambura Economic Education Journal, 7(3), 820–838. https://doi.org/10.37479/jeej.v7i3.27613
Nailah, Z. (2023). The Effect Of Hexagon Fraud Dimensions And Abuse Of Information Technology On Academic Fraud (Case Study On Feb Students Of Trisakti University) Pengaruh Dimensi Fraud Hexagon Dan Penyalahgunaan Teknologi Informasi Terhadap Kecurangan Akademik (Studi Kasus Pada Mahasiswa Feb Universitas Trisakti). Oktober, 4(4), 1123–1134. https://doi.org/10.53697/emak.v4i4
Neto, V. S., & Marques, O. R. B. (2022). Attitude–behaviour gap. In Encyclopedia of tourism management and marketing (pp. 200–202). Edward Elgar Publishing.https://www.elgaronline.com/display/edcoll/9781839100896/9781839100896.00034.xml.
Nurhalisa, S., & Fauzan, S. (2024). Penggunaan fraud pentagon theory untuk mengidentifikasi kecurangan akademik dengan niat sebagai variabel intervening. Business and Accounting Education Journal, 5(2), 187–216. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/baej/article/view/10671
Ong’are, O. D., & Njeru, A. (2022). Effectiveness Of Internal Control Systems On Fraud Prevention Among State Corporations In Kenya: A Case Of Kenya Pipeline Company. Retrieved www.strategicjournals.com
Roy, A., Newman, A., Round, H., & Bhattacharya, S. (2024). Ethical culture in organizations: A review and agenda for future research. Business Ethics Quarterly, 34(1), 97–138. https://doi.org/10.1017/beq.2022.44.
Sahla, W. A., & Ardianto, A. (2023). Ethical values and auditors fraud tendency perception: testing of fraud pentagon theory. Journal of Financial Crime, 30(4), 966–982. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-04-2022-0086
Said, J., Alam, M. M., Ramli, M., & Rafidi, M. (2017). Integrating Ethical Values into Fraud Triangle Theory in Assessing Employee Fraud: Evidence from the Malaysian Banking Industry. In Journal of International Studies (Vol. 10, Number 2). http://www.jois.eu/files/13_Saidetal.pdf
Sholikhah, Z., Adawiyah, W. R., Pramuka, B. A., & Pariyanti, E. (2024). Can spiritual power reduce online cheating behavior among university students? The fraud triangle theory perspective. Journal of International Education in Business, 17(1), 82–106. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIEB-11-2022-0082
Smith, J. S. (n.d.). Accounting Information Systems: Ethics, Fraudulent Behavior, and Preventative Measures. Retrieved https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/honors-theses
Solihat, W. M., Hermawan, Y., & Nurdianti, R. R. S. (2023). Pengaruh tekanan, kesempatan, rasionalisasi, kemampuan, dan arogansi terhadap perilaku kecurangan akademik mahasiswa pendidikan ekonomi. Global Education Journal, 1(3), 285–305. https://journal.civiliza.org/index.php/gej/article/view/179
Subastyan, G. M., & Dewi, E. F. K. (2024). Pentingnya pemahaman kode etik akuntan dalam membangun karakter akuntan. Jurnal Kajian Ekonomi dan Bisnis, 5(8), 3952–3960. https://journal.lppmunindra.ac.id/index.php/JKEB/article/view/3952
Vousinas, G. L. (2019). Advancing theory of fraud: the S.C.O.R.E. model. Journal of Financial Crime, 26(1), 372–381. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-12-2017-0128
Wira Utami, D. P., & Purnamasari, D. I. (2021). The impact of ethics and fraud pentagon theory on academic fraud behavior. Journal of Business and Information Systems (e-ISSN: 2685-2543), 3(1), 49–59. https://doi.org/10.36067/jbis.v3i1.88
Zamzam, I., Mahdi, S. A., & Ansar, R. (2017). Pengaruh diamond fraud dan tingkat religiusitas terhadap kecurangan akademik. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Peradaban, 3(2), 1–24. https://journal.uin-alauddin.ac.id/index.php/jiap/article/view/4343
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 E-Jurnal Akuntansi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.









