Factors Influencing Internal Control over Financial Reporting in Ministry X Government Assistance: A Symbolic Carrier Perspective

Authors

  • Riawati Anggraeni Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Ratna Wardhani Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Indonesia, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24843/EJA.2025.v35.i12.p06

Keywords:

Internal Control, institutional logics, symbolic carrier, Internal Control Over Financial Reporting (ICoFR/PIPK)

Abstract

Audit findings on government assistance expenditures at Ministry X reveal internal control weaknesses, particularly incomplete accountability reports and inconsistent procedural practices across work units. This condition indicates that the effectiveness of Internal Control over Financial Reporting (ICoFR) is influenced not only by technical mechanisms but also by institutional dimensions. This study aims to analyze symbolic factors affecting ICoFR effectiveness in government assistance programs. Using a qualitative approach, the study applies thematic analysis, constant comparison, and triangulation across implementing, assessment, and review teams. The findings identify four key symbolic carriers: formal regulations, integrity, accountability, and transparency. These factors shape daily routines and compliance patterns. However, when compliance remains predominantly symbolic and administrative rather than substantive, ICoFR effectiveness becomes constrained. This study contributes by demonstrating that limited ICoFR effectiveness is driven not only by technical shortcomings, but also by symbolic compliance embedded within institutional logics.

References

Alam, M. M., Said, J., & Abd Aziz, M. A. (2019). Role of integrity system, internal control system and leadership practices on the accountability practices in the public sectors of Malaysia. Social Responsibility Journal, 15(7), 955–976. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-03-2017-0051

Aziz, M. A. A., Rahman, H. A., Alam, Md. M., & Said, J. (2015). Enhancement of the Accountability of Public Sectors through Integrity System, Internal Control System and Leadership Practices: A Review Study. Procedia Economics and Finance, 28, 163–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2212-5671(15)01096-5

Brenya Bonsu, A., Appiah, K. O., Gyimah, P., & Owusu-Afriyie, R. (2023). Public sector accountability: do leadership practices, integrity and internal control systems matter? IIM Ranchi Journal of Management Studies, 2(1), 4–15. https://doi.org/10.1108/irjms-02-2022-0010

Hsu, A., & Schletz, M. (2024). Digital technologies–the missing link between climate action transparency and accountability? Climate Policy, 24(2), 193–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2023.2237937

Khersiat, O. M. (2020). The efficiency of applying the internal control components based on COSO framework to transparently carry out tasks and services, ensure integrity and enhance quality and efficiency: Case study-the greater amman municipality. International Journal of Financial Research, 11(2), 371–381. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijfr.v11n2p371

Kyriacou, A. P. (n.d.). “Defining Accountability.”

Matheus, R., Janssen, M., & Janowski, T. (2021). Design principles for creating digital transparency in government. Government Information Quarterly, 38(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101550

Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. In Source: The American Journal of Sociology (Vol. 83, Issue 2). http://www.jstor.orgURL:http://www.jstor.org/stable/2778293

Naimatuzarah. (n.d.).

Novatiani, A., Wedi, R., Kusumah, R., & Vabiani, D. P. (2019). Pengaruh Transparansi dan Akuntabilitas Terhadap Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah. In Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen dan Bisnis (Vol. 10). www.eporja.bandungbaratkab.go.id

Satria Saputra, D., & Abdullah, S. (n.d.). Pengaruh Transparansi, Akuntabilitas Dan Komitmen Organisasi Terhadap Kinerja Satuan Kerja Perangkat Daerah (Studi Pada Pemda Kabupaten Aceh Selatan). 3(2), 2014–2076.

Schnackenberg, A. K., Tomlinson, E., & Coen, C. (2021). The dimensional structure of transparency: A construct validation of transparency as disclosure, clarity, and accuracy in organizations. Human Relations, 74(10), 1628–1660. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726720933317

Scott, W. R. (2003). Institutional carriers: reviewing modes of transporting ideas over time and space and considering their consequences.

Zahari, A. I., Said, J., Muhamad, N., & Ramly, S. M. (2023). Evaluation of the Internal Control Systems in the Malaysian Public Sector. Proceedings of the International Conference in Technology, Humanities and Management (ICTHM 2023), 12-13 June, 2023, Istanbul, Turkey, 131, 472–482. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2023.11.40

Downloads

Published

31-12-2025

How to Cite

Anggraeni, R., & Wardhani, R. (2025). Factors Influencing Internal Control over Financial Reporting in Ministry X Government Assistance: A Symbolic Carrier Perspective . E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 35(12). https://doi.org/10.24843/EJA.2025.v35.i12.p06

Issue

Section

Articles