Beyond Costs: How Environmental Investment Enhances Innovation in Indonesian SMEs

Nilam Kemala Odang; Dany Juhandi; Putri Helendgri Simanungkalit

Authors

Nilam Kemala Odang Tax Accounting Study Program, Politeknik Wilmar Bisnis Indonesia, Indonesia
Dany Juhandi Horticultural Agribusiness Study Program, Politeknik Wilmar Bisnis Indonesia, Indonesia
Putri Helendgri Simanungkalit Tax Accounting Study Program, Politeknik Wilmar Bisnis Indonesia, Indonesia

Keywords:

EnEnvironmental Innovation, Environmental Investment, Environmental Cost

Abstract

This study examines the influence of environmental cost (EC) and environmental investment (E-INV) on environmental innovation (E-INN) in medium-scale manufacturing SMEs in Indonesia. Although many SMEs allocate budgets for environmental activities, it remains unclear whether such expenditures drive innovation. The study distinguishes between compliance-based costs and strategic investments—an approach rarely explored in the context of SMEs in developing countries. A survey of 106 SMEs was conducted and analyzed using PLS-SEM. EC has no significant effect on E-INN. In contrast, E-INV significantly and positively affects E-INN, indicating that only proactive, strategic investments enhance innovation capacity. The results confirm the Resource-Based View (RBV) by demonstrating that strategic environmental resources foster innovation. Simultaneously, the findings support institutional theory and the weak version of the Porter Hypothesis by showing that compliance spending alone is ineffective in driving innovation if it is not accompanied by strategy-oriented actions.

References

Aldieri, L., Kotsemir, M., & Vinci, C. P. (2020). The role of environmental innovation through the technological proximity in the implementation of the sustainable development. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(2), 493–502. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2382

Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108

Bouchmel, I., Ftiti, Z., Louhich, W., & Omri, A. (2024). Financing sources, green investment, and environmental performance: Cross-country evidence. Journal of Environmental Management, 353, 120230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120230

Burritt, R. L., Schaltegger, S., & Christ, K. L. (2023). Environmental management accounting – developments over the last 20 years from a framework perspective. Australian Accounting Review, 33(4), 336–351. https://doi.org/10.1111/auar.12407

DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101

Esfahbodi, A., Zhang, Y., & Watson, G. (2016). Sustainable supply chain management in emerging economies: Trade-offs between environmental and cost performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 181, 350–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.02.013

Fuzi, N. M., Habidin, N. F., Adam, S., & Ong, S. Y. Y. (2022). The relationship between environmental cost on organisational performance and environmental management system: a structural equation modelling approach. Measuring Business Excellence, 26(4), 496-507. https://doi.org/10/1108/MBE-03-2021-0039

Gerged, A. M., Zahoor, N., & Cowton, C. J. (2024). Understanding the relationship between environmental management accounting and firm performance: The role of environmental innovation and stakeholder integration – Evidence from a developing country. Management Accounting Research, 62, 100865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2023.100865

Gomez-Conde, J., Lunkes, R. J., & Rosa, F. S. (2019). Environmental innovation practices and operational performance. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 32(5), 1325–1357. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-01-2018-3327

Habidin, N. F., Hashim, S., Fuzi, N. M., & Salleh, M. I. (2018). Total productive maintenance, kaizen event, and performance. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 35(9), 1853–1867. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-11-2017-0234

Hair, J., & Alamer, A. (2022). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) in second language and education research: Guidelines using an applied example. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 1(3), 100027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2022.100027

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Using R. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7

Haleem, F., Farooq, S., Cheng, Y., & Waehrens, B. V. (2022). Sustainable management practices and stakeholder pressure: A systematic literature review. Sustainability, 14(4), 1967. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14041967

Hart, S. L. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. The Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 986. https://doi.org/10.2307/258963

Henri, J.-F., Boiral, O., & Roy, M.-J. (2016). Strategic cost management and performance: The case of environmental costs. The British Accounting Review, 48(2), 269–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2015.01.001

Hossain, M. I., Jamadar, Y., Islam, M. F., Rashed, M., & Akter, T. (2025). Environmental sustainability practices in SMEs: Insights from integrated PLS-SEM and fsQCA approaches. Journal of Cleaner Production, 503, 145185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.145185

Mady, K., Abdul Halim, M. A. S., Omar, K., Battour, M., & Abdelkareem, R. S. (2024). Environmental pressures and eco-innovation in manufacturing SMEs: the mediating effect of environmental capabilities. International Journal of Innovation Science, 16(3), 501–526. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-08-2022-0163

Mohd Fuzi, N., Habidin, N. F., Janudin, S. E., & Ong, S. Y. Y. (2019). Critical success factors of environmental management accounting practices: findings from Malaysian manufacturing industry. Measuring Business Excellence, 23(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1108/MBE-03-2018-0015

Odang, N. K., Murni, I., Zharaura, K. A., & Setiaji, Y. T. (2025). When control backfires : The double-edged role of management control systems in environmental capabilities and environmental management accounting practices. Jurnal Dinamika Akuntansi Dan Bisnis, 12(1), 153–174. https://doi.org/10.24815/jdab.v12i1.43670

Odang, N. K., & Sinambela, J. S. (2025). Does environmental management accounting associated with sustainability report disclosure? Jurnal Akuntansi Integratif, 11(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.29080/jai.v11i01.2026

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879

Porter, M. E., & Linde, C. van der. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 97–118. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.9.4.97

Ren, S., Hao, Y., & Wu, H. (2022). How Does Green Investment Affect Environmental Pollution? Evidence from China. Environmental and Resource Economics, 81(1), 25–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-021-00615-4

Sholihin, M., & Ratmono, D. (2021). Analisis SEM-PLS dengan WarpPLS 7.0 untuk hubungan nonlinier dalam penelitian sosial dan bisnis. Penerbit Andi.

Suhaili, M., & Sugiharsono, S. (2019). Role of MSME in absorbing labor and contribution to GDP. Economics Development Analysis Journal, 8(3), 301–315. https://doi.org/10.15294/edaj.v8i3.35229

Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z

Thomas, J., Yao, W., Zhang, F., & Zhu, W. (2022). Meet, beat, and pollute. Review of Accounting Studies, 27(3), 1038–1078. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-022-09694-0

Tipton, E. (2013). Stratified Sampling Using Cluster Analysis: A Sample Selection Strategy for Improved Generalizations From Experiments. Evaluation Review, 37(2), 109–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X13516324

Wang, M., Zhou, J., Xia, X., & Wang, Z. (2022). The mixed impact of environmental regulations and external financing constraints on green technological innovation of enterprise. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(19), 11972. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191911972

Wang, Z., Zhu, N., Wang, J., Hu, Y., & Nkana, M. (2022). The impact of environmental taxes on economic benefits and technology innovation input of heavily polluting industries in China. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.959939

Weijters, B., Cabooter, E., & Schillewaert, N. (2010). The effect of rating scale format on response styles: The number of response categories and response category labels. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 27(3), 236–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2010.02.004

Xie, T., & Yu, G. (2024). The impact of intelligent investment on corporate green innovation: Moderating effects of executive green perception and environmental regulation. Finance Research Letters, 69, 106089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.106089

Zhang, C., Zou, C. F., Luo, W., & Liao, L. (2022). Effect of environmental tax reform on corporate green technology innovation. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.1036810

Zhang, S., & Cheung, A. (Waikong). (2025). Are green finance and inclusive finance complements or substitutes for MSMEs? – Evidence from China’s green finance reform and innovation pilot zone. Energy Economics, 141, 108125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2024.108125

Zhang, W., Zhu, B., Li, Y., & Yan, D. (2024). Revisiting the Porter hypothesis: a multi-country meta-analysis of the relationship between environmental regulation and green innovation. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 232. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02671-9

Zhang, X., Song, Y., & Zhang, M. (2023). Exploring the relationship of green investment and green innovation: Evidence from Chinese corporate performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 412, 137444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137444

Zhang, Y., Shou, S., & Li, Y. (2024). Do green investments impact corporate green innovation?empirical evidence from Chinese-listed companies. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2024.1468843

Zhao, A., Zhang, H., Liu, Y., & Guan, H. (2024). Environmental taxes, technological innovation and firm performance: Evidence from China’s manufacturing firms. Heliyon, 10(10), e31386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31386

Zheng, Q., Li, J., & Duan, X. (2023). The Impact of Environmental Tax and R&D Tax Incentives on Green Innovation. Sustainability, 15(9), 7303. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15097303