Institutional and Economic Determinants of Ecological Fiscal Transfers in Indonesia

Puput Anggraeni Saputri; Novi Dirgantari; Iwan Fakhruddin; Ani Kusbandiyah

doi:10.24843/EJA.2025.v35.i07.p10

Authors

Puput Anggraeni Saputri Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto, Indonesia
Novi Dirgantari Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto, Indonesia
Iwan Fakhruddin Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto, Indonesia
Ani Kusbandiyah Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24843/EJA.2025.v35.i07.p10

Keywords:

Ecological Fiscal Transfer, Size of Local Government, Biodiversity, Natural Resource Revenue Sharing

Abstract

This research aims to identify the factors that determine the allocation of ecological fiscal transfer, including the size of local governments, biodiversity program diversity, and revenue sharing from natural resources. The sampling method employs purposive sampling and is analyzed using multiple regression analysis. The population of this research is the local government that plans and implements ecological fiscal transfers recorded in the DJPK of the Ministry of Finance in 2021-2023 with an analysis sample of 32 data that implement and plan ecological fiscal transfer. The findings of this study suggest that the size of local governments and revenue sharing from natural resources positively influence ecological fiscal transfer, while the diversity of biodiversity programs negatively impacts ecological fiscal transfer.

References

Aditiya, N. Y., & Dirgantari, N. (2017). Pengaruh pendapatan asli daerah (pad), dana alokasi umum (dau), dana alokasi khusus (dak) dan sisa lebih pembiayaan anggaran (silpa) terhadap belanja modal pada kabupaten dan kota di jawa tengah tahun 2013-2015. Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto, 7(November), 14–25.

Aronggear, A. B., & Ungirwalu, A. (2021). Papua (Trend of Rounded Wood Production from IUPHHK and its Contributions towards PNBP Receipt of Forestry Sector in Papua Province). Jurnal Kehutanan Papuasia, 7(2), 171–185.

Badan Informasi Geospasial. (2021). Peraturan Badan Informasi Geospasial Republik Indonesia Nomor 13 Tahun 2021. In Tentang Sistem Referensi Geospasial Indonesia (Issue 575). www.peraturan.go.id

Busch, J., & Mukherjee, A. (2018). Encouraging State Governments to Protect and Restore Forests Using Ecological Fiscal Transfers: India’s Tax Revenue Distribution Reform. Conservation Letters, 11(2), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12416

Busch, J., Ring, I., Akullo, M., Amarjargal, O., Borie, M., Cassola, R. S., Cruz-Trinidad, A., Droste, N., Haryanto, J. T., Kasymov, U., Kotenko, N. V., Lhkagvadorj, A., De Paulo, F. L. L., May, P. H., Mukherjee, A., Mumbunan, S., Santos, R., Tacconi, L., Verde Selva, G., … Zhou, K. (2021). A global review of ecological fiscal transfers. Nature Sustainability, 4(9), 756–765. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-021-00728-0

Canavire-bacarreza, G., Martinez-vazquez, J., Kebijakan, P., Internasional, P., Studi, S., & Andrew, K. (2019). Meneliti kembali faktor penentu desentralisasi fiskal : apa peran geografi ? 2016, 1–41. https://doi.org/10.1093/saya/lbw032

Coleman, james s. (1990). Foundations of Social Theory. In Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1990, pp. xvi + 993. (Vol. 2, p. 294). https://doi.org/10.12681/sas.623

Commision, E. (2024). Biodiversity measurement approaches A practitioner ’ s guide for financial institutions. November.

de Paulo, F. L. L., & Camões, P. J. S. (2020). An analysis of delay in implementing ecological fiscal transfers in Brazil. Environmental Development, 37(August), 100550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2020.100550

Desdiani, N. A., Afifi, F. A. R., Cesarina, A., Sabrina, S., Husna, M., Violeta, R. M., Adinegoro, A., & Halimatussadiah, A. (2021). Climate and Environmental Financing at Regional Level: Amplifying and Seizing the Opportunities. LPEM Working Paper, 067(December), 17.

Dougherty, S., & Montes, A. (2023). The multi-level fiscal governance of ecological transition. 2018, 1–11.

Droste, N., Ring, I., Santos, R., & Kettunen, M. (2016). Based Design Options of a Transnational Scheme.

Eisenack, K. (2024). Why Local Governments Set Climate Targets: Effects of City Size and Political Costs. In Environmental and Resource Economics (Vol. 87, Issue 11). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-024-00919-1

Gu, Z., Tian, C., Zheng, Z., & Zhang, S. (2022). Favorable Fiscal Self-Sufficiency Enables Local Governments to Better Improve the Environmental Governance—Evidence from China’s Lower-Pollution Areas. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(23). https://doi.org/10.3390/su142316202

Halimatussadiah, A., Moeis, F. R., Haryanto, J. T., & Saputra, W. (2021). Policy Brief Seri Transfer Fiskal Berbasis Ekologi: Menjajaki Opsi Kebijakan Dana Desa Berbasis Ekologi. 1–6.

Haryanto, J. T. (2015). sebagai Potensi Pendanaan Lingkungan di Daerah. 18, 252–266.

Haryanto, J. T. (2016). Opsi Pendanaan Biodiversity di Indonesia (Option Biodiversity Funding in Indonesia). Jurnal Biologi Indonesia, 12(1), 65–79. https://e-journal.biologi.lipi.go.id/index.php/jurnal_biologi_indonesia/article/viewFile/2318/2505

Herlambang, D. (2025). 2023 Berpotensi Menjadi Tahun Terpanas, Mitigasi Perubahan Iklim Harus Dimasifkan. BMKG. https://www.bmkg.go.id/berita/utama/tahun-2023-berpotensi-menjadi-tahun-terpanas-mitigasi-perubahan-iklim-harus-dimasifkan

Iqbal, M. (2022). 10+ Penyebab Kebakaran Hutan di Indonesia. Lindungi Hutan. https://lindungihutan.com/blog/10-penyebab-kebakaran-hutan-di-indonesia/

Kehutanan, D. J. K. kementrian lingkungan hidup dan. (2023). Laporan kinerja Direktorat Jenderal Konservasi Sumber Daya Alam dan Ekosistem.

Kementrian Keuangan. (2023). ANGGARAN PENDAPATAN DAN BELANJA NEGARA. Kemenkeu. Informasi-APBN-Tahun-Anggaran-2024[1].pdf

Köllner, T., Schelske, O., & Seidl, I. (2002). Integrating biodiversity into intergovernmental fiscal transfers based on cantonal benchmarking: A Swiss case study. Basic and Applied Ecology, 3(4), 381–391. https://doi.org/10.1078/1439-1791-00104

Kusbandiyah, A., Fakhruddin, I., Pratama, B. C., & Setyono, D. (2022). Differences In Tax Avoidance Behavior Before And During Covid 19 In Non Cyclical Customer Companies On The Indonesia Stock Exchange. 3–6. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.10-8-2022.2320795

Lima de Paulo, F. L., & Camões, P. J. S. (2019). Ecological Fiscal Transfers for Biodiversity Conservation Policy: A Transaction Costs Analysis of Minas Gerais, Brazil. Ecological Economics, 166(June), 106425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106425

Manurung, T. (2019). Skema Pembiayaan Konservasi dan Pelestarian Hutan Melalui Model Transfer Fiskal berbasis Ekologis di Indonesia. Auriga.or.Id, September, 1–43. https://auriga.or.id/related/getFilePdf/en/related/41/skema_pembiayaan_konservasi_dan_pelestarian_hutan_melalui_model_transfer_fiskal_berbasis_ekologis_di_indonesia_en.pdf

Martinez-Vazquez, J., & Timofeev, A. (2009). A fiscal perspective of state rescaling. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 2(1), 85–105. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsn027

Matatula, J. (2024). Ekologi Perairan. In Asrul (Ed.), Insight Mediatama.

Mumbunan, S., Ring, I., & Lenk, T. (2012). Ecological fiscal transfers at the provincial level in Indonesia. UFZ Discussion Papers, 6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1433.2010.01225.x

Nevi Costari, & Putri Ariella Belinda. (2021). Pentingnya Implementasi Akuntansi Sektor Publik Dalam Suatu Instansi Pemerintahan. Jamanta : Jurnal Mahasiswa Akuntansi Unita, 1(1), 58–77. https://doi.org/10.36563/jamanta_unita.v1i1.421

Olivia, D. (2020). Kerangka Penyelenggaraan Desentralisasi. 1(2), 85–93.

Palapessy, A., Kastanya, A., Siahaya, T., Cities, D., & Cities, N. D. (2024). Kontribusi sektor kehutanan dari provisi sumber daya hutan ( psdh ) hasil hutan kayu dan hasil hutan bukan Contribution Of The Forestry Sector From Forest Resources Provision ( PSDH ) Timber Forest Products And Non-Wood Forest Products To Regional Revenue. 07(3), 422–428.

PDSI, Pusdantinkom, & BNPB. (2024). Statistik Bencana, Korban dan Kerusakan Menurut Jenis. Data Informasi Dan Bencana Alam. https://dibi.bnpb.go.id/statistik_menurut_bencana

Pemerintah Indonesia. (1990). Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1990. file:///C:/Users/Puput Anggraeni/AppData/Local/Microsoft/Windows/INetCache/IE/AG4AF1PR/Peraturan BIG Nomor 13 Tahun 2021[1].pdf

Pramono, H., Fakhruddin, I., & Hapsari, I. (2022). Pengaruh Corporate Social Responsibility dan Kinerja Keuangan Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan. Ratio : Reviu Akuntansi Kontemporer Indonesia, 3(2), 78. https://doi.org/10.30595/ratio.v3i2.13751

Ridwan, G., & Fitriyani, R. (2022). Policy Brief Mendorong Replikasi dan Pelembagaan Transfer Fiskal Berbasis Ekologi (EFT) Melalui Skema TAPE dan TAKE di Indonesia. https://seknasfitra.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/PB-2022.pdf

Samborska, V., & Hannah, R. (2024). Wildfires. Ourworldindata. https://ourworldindata-org.translate.goog/wildfires?_x_tr_sl=en&_x_tr_tl=id&_x_tr_hl=id&_x_tr_pto=tc

Santos Rui, R., Ring, I., Antunes, P., & Clemente, P. (2012). Fiscal transfers for biodiversity conservation: The Portuguese Local Finances Law. Land Use Policy, 29(2), 261–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.06.001

Saputra, W., Halimatussadiah, A., Haryanto, J. T., Moeis, F. R., Nurfatriani, F., & Salminah, M. (2021). Designing Ecological Fiscal Transfer Policy Using the Regional Incentive Fund (DID), Specific Allocation Fund (DAK), and Village Fund (DD) to Realize Sustainable Forest Governance in Indonesia. XV World Forestry Congress, 1–9.

Schröter-Schlaack, C., Ring, I., Koellner, T., Santos, R., Antunes, P., Clemente, P., Mathevet, R., Borie, M., & Grodzińska-Jurczak, M. (2014). Intergovernmental fiscal transfers to support local conservation action in Europe. Zeitschrift Fur Wirtschaftsgeographie, 58(2–3), 98–114. https://doi.org/10.1515/zfw.2014.0007

Sipongi. (2024). Indikasi Luas Kebakaran. Kementrian Lingkungan Hidup Dan Kehutanan. https://sipongi.menlhk.go.id/indikasi-luas-kebakaran

Siregar, E. S., Adawiyah, R., & Putriani, N. (2021). Dampak Aktivitas Pertambangan Emas Terhadap Kondisi Ekonomi Dan Lingkungan Masyarakat Muara Soma Kecamatan Batang Natal. Jurnal Education and Development , 9(2), 556–561.

Soeprobowati, T. R., Saraswati, T. R., & Jumari. (2020). Biodiversity as a tool for environmental assessment. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2231(February). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0002508

Tianawati, E. T. (2022). Pengaruh Pendapatan Asli Daerah Dan Dana Transfer Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah Kabupaten Bogor Tahun 2016-2020. November, 1–65.

Visconti, P., Di Marco, M., Álvarez-Romero, J. G., Januchowski-Hartley, S. R., Pressey, R. L., Weeks, R., & Rondinini, C. (2013). Effects of errors and gaps in spatial data sets on assessment of conservation progress. Conservation Biology, 27(5), 1000–1010. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12095

Wang, Y. (2022). Fiscal Ecological Cost of Land in China: Estimation and Regional Differences.

WCMC, U. (2024). Nature Restored. UNEO. www.unep-wcmc.org